THE MORALS ( or lack of of leaving 3 children under 4 alone)

[carlymichelle]

notice stephen no one has  been answering my? that i posted they brought the mcanns back into it again my  orginal question was do they support the mcanns because they to left their children

[stephen25000]

notice stephen no one has  been answering my? that i posted they brought the mcanns back into it again my  orginal question was do they support the mcanns because they to left their children

Indeed I have.

I am also aware that you have been abused and threatened by some of the mccanns 'supporters'.

[carlymichelle]

dead silence??  so they cant answer if they have or have not?? 8-)(--)

[Mo Stache]

we can dance around the issue with pros as much as we like but the reality is if  the mcanns had not been out drinking  or whatever did happen on that holiday maddie would still be here  would you leave your  children like the mcanns did yes or no?? or have you in the past time to admit it

The McCann's could have "been out drinking of whatever did happen on that holiday", but without the presents of someone who entered the premises without permission, Madeleine wouldn't be missing. It's not the drinking that made her 'go missing', it was actually the person who took her. They could have been totally inebriated and crawling back to the apartment without having done any checks on the kids, to find that the kids were all still there. Unfortunately they made a terrible error and they provide an abductor with the opportunity to strike.
Would I leave my children as they did, no I wouldn't have, but in supporting the McCann's it does not mean I support all their choices.

[AnneGuedes]

my  orginal question was do they support the mcanns because they to left their children

They support the McCanns not because, but in spite of the fact they left their children alone.
They support the McCanns because they believe them, i.e they believe Madeleine was abducted.
I don't think she was. But also I don't think the McCanns were criminals to leave their children alone in an open flat. I understand they found it safe and were lazy.
What I don't understand is how they could leave alone a child who knew she was left alone.
Actually I must say that I can't believe that, knowing Madeleine had discovered, they deliberately left her alone once more. They may lack of imagination but up to this point imo isn't plausible.

[Jazzy]

i think threats of violence on any side is  wrong i have had them myself  and the mcanns should not have them either

How about abuse?

[Jazzy]

notice stephen no one has  been answering my? that i posted they brought the mcanns back into it again my  orginal question was do they support the mcanns because they to left their children

You haven't been answered then? I condemned leaving the children, so did another poster.

No, never left my children alone by themselves in similar circumstances when they were young, I'll confess to the odd loo run, but they were never left to fend for themselves.

So........................................my question:

Have you ever posted abuse towards the Mccanns? Think carefully.

[Mo Stache]

You haven't been answered then? I condemned leaving the children, so did another poster.

No, never left my children alone by themselves in similar circumstances when they were young, I'll confess to the odd loo run, but they were never left to fend for themselves.

So........................................my question:

Have you ever posted abuse towards the Mccanns? Think carefully.

One example was posted up by herself, in the screenshot she claims abuses her. The mentions of her behaviour towards the McCann's. I am sure many of us have seen the vile posts she has made in the past.   

[Jazzy]

One inparticular springs to mind, doesn't it, Mo?

[Benita]

notice stephen no one has  been answering my? that i posted they brought the mcanns back into it again my  orginal question was do they support the mcanns because they to left their children

I support the mccanns because they are the parents of a missing child they did no more than what 1'000's of other people do when they use baby listening services

do you support predators who steal children ?

[Jazzy]

I support the mccanns because they are the parents of a missing child they did no more than what 1'000's of other people do when they use baby listening services

do you support predators who steal children ?

Many of them do, there was a thread on this very forum about the merits of leaving Madeliene, were she to be found with whoever she has been with all this time.

[carlymichelle]

I support the mccanns because they are the parents of a missing child they did no more than what 1'000's of other people do when they use baby listening services

do you support predators who steal children ?

of course not but do you   have proof she was stolen no just like we dont have proof maddie wasnt abducted its called being open minded and  thinking     for yourself not being a lemon and  making  people believe  everything the media tells  you

[stephen25000]

I support the mccanns because they are the parents of a missing child they did no more than what 1'000's of other people do when they use baby listening services

do you support predators who steal children ?

This is a diversion and no more.

The Mccanns left their children unattended, apart from occasional and unverified checks.

Madeleine disappeared as a consequence of this.

Likewise , no proof of abduction.

[carlymichelle]

fgs stop looking for the sympathy vote carly ..its not about you you know

no unlike the mcanns i dont have a begging bowl out at every second

[carlymichelle]

This is a diversion and no more.

The Mccanns left their children unattended, apart from occasional and unverified checks.

Madeleine disappeared as a consequence of this.

Likewise , no proof of abduction.

]

exactly so why did they swallow the mcanns version hook line and sinker?