Anything and everything

[Benita]

he definitely says their!! motive ....

[Kazcutt]

Well thanksbut if it didnt matter you wouldnt  have brought  it up in first place.....anyway
What aor possibly their  motive is....true youcant tell with glasweigians but thats how i heard it

Lol you didn't know either

[Wonderfulspam]

Both nauseous odious characters...wouldnt trust either of them as far as I could throw them..

expunge? He hasnt a clue what happened, why would he want to expunge anything...oh....for money .....obviously...well he has miserably failed LOL to expunge much at all

Going back to my conspiracy theory on 'expunge' & 'portray' & political egg on face

Going after Amaral & claiming he was a lone wolf, bungling cop etc, backfired a bit in 2010

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/portugal/6974917/Madeleine-McCanns-death-covered-up-by-parents-who-faked-kidnap-court-hears.html

Mr de Almeida also complained that Portuguese police efforts to investigate the McCanns had been frustrated by their British counterparts.
 “We were told that the UK would not accept any investigation of the McCanns – there was a lack of cooperation,” he said.

But later he said that the theory that the parents had covered up Madeleine’s death as outlined in Amaral’s book was one reached by British police on the ground in Portugal too.

“This wasn’t something invented by Amaral,” he insisted. “It was a conclusion reached by the team of Portuguese investigators as well as British police.”



“We were told that the UK would not accept any investigation of the McCanns – there was a lack of cooperation,”

 >@@(*&)

[Redblossom]

Lol you didn't know either

I never said I did....I too thought he said "her" at one time...it just is not clear at all...its more  likely a or her, I dont hear their at all
 

Maybe a fellow  glaswegian here can lipread and or decipher.....

[Benita]

Lol you didn't know either

what else could it be apart from their  >@@(*&)..? and im not jumping on you by the way ...

[stephen25000]

Going back to my conspiracy theory on 'expunge' & 'portray' & political egg on face

Going after Amaral & claiming he was a lone wolf, bungling cop etc, backfired a bit in 2010

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/portugal/6974917/Madeleine-McCanns-death-covered-up-by-parents-who-faked-kidnap-court-hears.html

Mr de Almeida also complained that Portuguese police efforts to investigate the McCanns had been frustrated by their British counterparts.
 “We were told that the UK would not accept any investigation of the McCanns – there was a lack of cooperation,” he said.

But later he said that the theory that the parents had covered up Madeleine’s death as outlined in Amaral’s book was one reached by British police on the ground in Portugal too.

“This wasn’t something invented by Amaral,” he insisted. “It was a conclusion reached by the team of Portuguese investigators as well as British police.”



“We were told that the UK would not accept any investigation of the McCanns – there was a lack of cooperation,”

 >@@(*&)

i.e. they were being protected. >@@(*&)

[Benita]

I never said I did....I too thought he said "her" at one time...it just is not clear at all...its more  likely a or her, I dont hear their at all
 

Maybe a fellow  glaswegian here can lipread and or decipher.....

her-their sounds very similar to me ...so im going for their ...

[Redblossom]

Going back to my conspiracy theory on 'expunge' & 'portray' & political egg on face

Going after Amaral & claiming he was a lone wolf, bungling cop etc, backfired a bit in 2010

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/portugal/6974917/Madeleine-McCanns-death-covered-up-by-parents-who-faked-kidnap-court-hears.html

Mr de Almeida also complained that Portuguese police efforts to investigate the McCanns had been frustrated by their British counterparts.
 “We were told that the UK would not accept any investigation of the McCanns – there was a lack of cooperation,” he said.

But later he said that the theory that the parents had covered up Madeleine’s death as outlined in Amaral’s book was one reached by British police on the ground in Portugal too.

“This wasn’t something invented by Amaral,” he insisted. “It was a conclusion reached by the team of Portuguese investigators as well as British police.”



“We were told that the UK would not accept any investigation of the McCanns – there was a lack of cooperation,”

 >@@(*&)

I am not a conspiracy theorist but there is a slight stench here........well maybe a bit more.....as I posted earlier, the LP were quite unprofessional in adveritsing the findmadeleine website on their police page even after they were made suspects...promoting people to go to THEM with information, how bizarre......

[Kazcutt]

what else could it be apart from their  >@@(*&)..? and im not jumping on you by the way ...

Well I was just watching  and stunned he said her so I went back again and again and again
Probably was their but it sounded like her .im sure if he said her the someone would have asked him .

Nothing to write home about I suppose just threw me

[sadie]

Going back to my conspiracy theory on 'expunge' & 'portray' & political egg on face

Going after Amaral & claiming he was a lone wolf, bungling cop etc, backfired a bit in 2010

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/portugal/6974917/Madeleine-McCanns-death-covered-up-by-parents-who-faked-kidnap-court-hears.html

Mr de Almeida also complained that Portuguese police efforts to investigate the McCanns had been frustrated by their British counterparts.
 “We were told that the UK would not accept any investigation of the McCanns – there was a lack of cooperation,” he said.

But later he said that the theory that the parents had covered up Madeleine’s death as outlined in Amaral’s book was one reached by British police on the ground in Portugal too.

“This wasn’t something invented by Amaral,” he insisted. “It was a conclusion reached by the team of Portuguese investigators as well as British police.”



“We were told that the UK would not accept any investigation of the McCanns – there was a lack of cooperation,”

 >@@(*&)

1)  Insp. Tavares de Almeida found guilty of the crime of torture of  CP Official Virgolino Borges and given a 2 1/2 year suspended sentence
2)  Insp. Goncalo Amaral found guilty of perjury in the torture case of Leonor Cipriano and given a 1 1/2 year suspended sentence

Two criminals in that article, Wonderfulspam.  One supporting the other.

Why should we believe such people?  They are both mixed up in torture and both criminals.

Please dont offer articles that promote such evil peoples views.  Such people have no credibility in the normal world.

[Wonderfulspam]

1)  Insp. Tavares de Almeida found guilty of the crime of torture of  CP Official Virgolino Borges and given a 2 1/2 year suspended sentence
2)  Insp. Goncalo Amaral found guilty of perjury in the torture case of Leonor Cipriano and given a 1 1/2 year suspended sentence

Two criminals in that article, Wonderfulspam.  One supporting the other.

Why should we believe such people?  They are both mixed up in torture and both criminals.

Please dont offer articles that promote such evil peoples views.  Such people have no credibility in the normal world.

Suspended sentences, that's all. It's not like they murdered anyone is it?

[Mr Gray]

Suspended sentences, that's all. It's not like they murdered anyone is it?

Most sensible people would think its wrong to have a convicted criminal in the police force

[Redblossom]

Most sensible people would think its wrong to have a convicted criminal in the police force

Most sensible people would get their facts right before posting.....are your really sure  Amaral was a serving police officer after he got his ridiculous conviction?
 




Now whose a silly billy posting imaginings or erroneous memories as facts!

Oh and you carry on posting convicted crimimal,the dramatic effect  is astounding.....





 

[Wonderfulspam]

Most sensible people would think its wrong to have a convicted criminal in the police force

I trust their judgement on the case, I think Amaral comes across as a decent guy who became a victim of politics followed by a vicous smear campaign,  he had a right to defend himself by writing his book.

[sadie]

Perhaps the family didnt want her picture splshed all over the papers! It wasnt the press saying its not her, they were quoting a named official source, quite a rarity as well, the federal prosecutors spokesperson....obviously the girls identity was checked out.....why on earth would they lie?
Maybe she was lucky that she didnt have to get her dna taken.....to prove who she was!!! But youre free to carry on thnking or wishing it really was Madeleine....list of quotes you dont believe here....

http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Lieve-Pellens/1099200936

Oh BTW they were not walking up and down the street, just one direction, caught from three different cameras placed in different locations

All three places where credible sightings of Madeleine took place,
 
1)  The Rif Mountains (Zinat) in Morocco,
2)  seedy Molenbeek St Jean in Brussels and
3)  Leh in the high Himalayas in Indai

A fair number of peeps at these places make their bread and butter caviar from drug trafficking and processing hemp.  A high percentage of peeps are involved in the "business" in some way, and will earn a decent crust.  The others mainly live as paupers.

Where drugs trafficking is concerned there will be gangsters



Anyone been to Morocco and visited such outlying places? .... I have, but not drug running places as far as I am aware.  Poverty abounds. 

Anyone been up in the Himalayas of India and tasted the life up there?  ..... My daughter has.  Once again not drug running places, I believe.  But poverty abounds there too

And Molenbeek is mainly inhabited by peeps from the Rif.  You can bet poverty, along with the gangster type peeps, is there, but quite a few will earn a decent crust

Criminals abound in places like that.  Peeps in such places learn very early on to keep their mouths shut, even to lie.  One doesn't kill the Goose that lays the golden egg.  One keeps to the "Company Rules" and does as one is told.

If bribery doesn't work and it almost certainly would in such poverty stricken places, then gangsters can use gangster methods to silence peeps.

They can persuade people to say what they demand

Just as tortured people can be forced to say things to avoid further torture....
......and in any case many/most of the officials will already be corrupt, or in fear ... so vulnerable, in such places




The Big Bosses are not going to have a ?billion /?trillion pound business ruined because one person wants to tell the truth.



Sorry but in such places one cannot guarentee the truth