I'm NOT talking about calling Witham, I said it's odd that he didn't dial 999! The fact that 'crazy' and 'gun' was mentioned in a call supposedly received at 3am - doesn't need a 'precedent' it's common sense. You asked for a source that mentions JB stating his father sounded 'frightened' both West and Myall mention this - here is Myall's statement (page 2).
You also said you thought it "odd" that JB called Witham which I am surprised about given that you claim to have read West's WS many times and hence would understand that Witham covered WHF. If JB is guilty what would be the advantage to him of calling Witham and eventually Chelmsford over 999? As far as I can see nothing? In any event as far as I am aware when a member of the public calls the police about an incident regardless of whether they call the local station or 999 the police determine the level of seriousness and appropriate response based on effectively a Q&A session with the caller. This can be evidenced by West's WS. You must have seen crime/emergency services dramas and witnessed similar?
JB claims:
- He was woken by his phone ringing at approx 3.10am
- It was NB and he said "Sheilas gone crazy she has got the gun" (nothing about coming over)
- The line went dead
- JB called back twice using the redial button on his phone. Both occasions he got the engaged tone (seems to contradict with tel eng testimony at trial)
- He then called Witham no response
- He then called Chelmsford and spoke with West who got in touch with Witham and a car was sent
Other info that may have had a bearing on JB's decision making:
- SC had a long history of mental illness
- SC had no previous history of serious violence and aggression
- NB managed SC's moods/condition with some success eg when she phoned him late at night claiming to be Virgin Mary, Joan of Arc, leader of CND and when he was called to her London flat by Freddie.
- Did NB want JB to go over and assist in recovering the gun from her?
- NB had a low opinion of the police
- NB liked to keep family matters within the immediate family
- NB was a local magistrate: privacy as above and familiar with local police
- Did NB want JB to call the police knowing it would be time consuming to give all the personal details and background. Meanwhile NB could try and calm/reason with SC
- What sort of navigation system did patrol cars have if any? If a map only perhaps WHF was difficult to find and NB thought JB could assist with directions
- If the police were called would it make the situation worse as with the electricity man? What could the police do if SC was being totally unreasonable in possession of a loaded firearm? Dont think taser guns were around then? In the end they might have had to shoot to maim?
The phone calls are subjective and based on the whims of human behaviour both in terms of NB and JB's response and how others interpret them. In the absence of digitally recorded call times and taped recordings its all hopelessly unreliable. I dont think anything can be read into the phone calls in isolation its all part of a bigger picture.
I think you will find JB uses the word "distressed" to describe NB and not "frightened" as claimed by West and Myalls.
The only thing that stands out for me is the fact that at trial the tel eng said if WHF was off the hook JB would not be able to call out at Goldhanger for 1 - 2 minutes. And yet he said he redialled NB immediately by hitting his redial button and got the engaged tone?