Wandering Off Topic

[Vertigo Swirl]

It seems someone has rather landed themselves in it. If the member knows the name of the person who supplied the information to Blacksmith a) the webmistress has revealed private information to a second party....so rather hypocritical to accuse anyone else of the same thing. b) the member is rather closer to the McCann machinery than previously revealed.

All very interesting.

Not really - some people were simply very careless in the early days of their trolling and had accounts under their real names.  The webmistress has revealed nothing, the troll did that all by herself.  Silly girl!

[faithlilly]

The webmistress has revealed details that could only have been known to herself and her correspondent. That’s simply logic.

It does explain however how even the mention of the webmistress’s name brings on apoplexy in a certain member.

Oops !!!

[Vertigo Swirl]

The webmistress has revealed details that could only have been known to herself and her correspondent. That’s simply logic.

It does explain however how even the mention of the webmistress’s name brings on apoplexy in a certain member.

Oops !!!

Some people just haven't got a clue how easily their repetitive and sanctimonious online crowing used to give them away.  And if people want to add 2 and 2 to get 500, it's absolutely no skin off my nose. 

[Brietta]

Not me, I've no idea what it's all about, other than it seems pretty trivial.

Your posts always give me the impression that is par for the course as far as you are concerned.

Why was BS influenced by the threat of libel?

Does the telecommunications act cover fora PMs.

Or was what he posted actually just a pack of lies which could be proven by the webmaster/mistress to be exactly that?

[faithlilly]

Your posts always give me the impression that is par for the course as far as you are concerned.

Why was BS influenced by the threat of libel?

Does the telecommunications act cover fora PMs.

Or was what he posted actually just a pack of lies which could be proven by the webmaster/mistress to be exactly that?

Libel? Did I say libel? No....don’t think I did. I said legal action.

If anything has to be proven the original correspondence is still available...and, for clarification, it was not via PM.

[faithlilly]

“If you do not tell the truth about yourself you cannot tell it about other people.”
― Virginia Woolf

[Vertigo Swirl]

“If you do not tell the truth about yourself you cannot tell it about other people.”
― Virginia Woolf

So tell the truth about yourself and own up to your actions.

[jassi]

Your posts always give me the impression that is par for the course as far as you are concerned.

Why was BS influenced by the threat of libel?

Does the telecommunications act cover fora PMs.

Or was what he posted actually just a pack of lies which could be proven by the webmaster/mistress to be exactly that?

Probably because I don't devote my life to the cause McCann.

I just dip in and out as the mood takes me.

[Eleanor]

I am appalled by the vein of these comments.  My PMs are Private.  What on earth do you all think you are trying to do?

[G-Unit]

I am appalled by the vein of these comments.  My PMs are Private.  What on earth do you all think you are trying to do?

When you communicate with someone, be it in person, by phone or in writing there's always a risk that they'll repeat what you tell them. There's no such thing as a private pm.

[Vertigo Swirl]

When you communicate with someone, be it in person, by phone or in writing there's always a risk that they'll repeat what you tell them. There's no such thing as a private pm.

The clue’s in the name.  Private message.  Of course if you communicate with someone by private message there is always the possibility that they will ignore etiquette and plaster your private messages all over the internet but that tends to reveal more about the leaker than the leaked, imo.

[Eleanor]

When you communicate with someone, be it in person, by phone or in writing there's always a risk that they'll repeat what you tell them. There's no such thing as a private pm.

Then I feel seriously sorry for you.  I had not realised how badly damaged some of you are.

Alice died two years ago coming up the 9th of January and none of you knew about he and me or what a joy he was to me.

I am briefly disgusted with the lot of you.

[Eleanor]

The clue’s in the name.  Private message.  Of course if you communicate with someone by private message there is always the possibility that they will ignore etiquette and plaster your private messages all over the internet but that tends to reveal more about the leaker than the leaked, imo.

No one has ever done this to me.  Or I to them.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No one has ever done this to me.  Or I to them.

Likewise, some people however are proud of their mischief-making.

[G-Unit]

Then I feel seriously sorry for you.  I had not realised how badly damaged some of you are.

Alice died two years ago coming up the 9th of January and none of you knew about he and me or what a joy he was to me.

I am briefly disgusted with the lot of you.

There's no need to feel sorry for anyone who is careful what they say to strangers; it's just common sense. Do you think you were the only one who spoke privately to Alice?