Wandering Off Topic

[Brietta]

No, that's not it.

At least you acknowledge there is a problem.  That's always a start 😁

[Brietta]

I'll be interested to read your posts on CB's current "innocence" of killing Madeleine.

The main individuals in the sceptic world denied the presumption of innocence are Kate and Gerry McCann.  Brueckner's rights will be defended I presume by very expensive lawyers and the law of the land.

I have seen nowhere that Brueckner has had to take recourse to the ECHR to defend his entitlement to that human right but I know the McCanns have had to.

Why sceptics cannot see the hypocrisy of their super sensibility in defence of Brueckner's rights and their attitude in trying to trample McCann rights into the dust remains a mystery.

[Eleanor]

Double Standards yet again.  The McCanns don't appear to have The Presumption of Innocence for some.

But Breuckner will get that from me and always did have it.  Until and if he is found guilty.

Billy Whiz is just trying to score points without any knowledge of what I have been saying from the start.

It's always a good idea to check your facts before you attempt to malign someone like me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Double Standards yet again.  The McCanns don't appear to have The Presumption of Innocence for some.

But Breuckner will get that from me and always did have it.  Until and if he is found guilty.

Billy Whiz is just trying to score points without any knowledge of what I have been saying from the start.

It's always a good idea to check your facts before you attempt to malign someone like me.

I can vouch for the fact that you have always spoken up for Bruckner's right to the presumption of innocence.

[Eleanor]

I can vouch for the fact that you have always spoken up for Bruckner's right to the presumption of innocence.

Thanks, VS.  I can't do anything else.  I have fought too hard and too long for this right for The McCanns.

[G-Unit]

Thanks, VS.  I can't do anything else.  I have fought too hard and too long for this right for The McCanns.

There is no evidence at the moment that their right to the presumption of innocence has been breached. Rumour, accusations and beliefs are not evidence.

[Eleanor]

There is no evidence at the moment that their right to the presumption of innocence has been breached. Rumour, accusations and beliefs are not evidence.

Read this Forum.

Not that I have a problem with the right to an opinion.  But if anyone thinks this Forum can be turned into a Cess Pit  with misinformation, lies and innuendo then it will happen over my dead body.

[barrier]

Read this Forum.

Not that I have a problem with the right to an opinion.  But if anyone thinks this Forum can be turned into a Cess Pit  with misinformation, lies and innuendo then it will happen over my dead body.

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

[Eleanor]

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

And none so stupid as those who have no common sense or logic.

[G-Unit]

Read this Forum.

Not that I have a problem with the right to an opinion.  But if anyone thinks this Forum can be turned into a Cess Pit  with misinformation, lies and innuendo then it will happen over my dead body.

Perhaps I should rephrase my post. At this time there is no record of any court finding anyone guilty of breaching the McCann's right to the presumption of innocence.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Perhaps I should rephrase my post. At this time there is no record of any court finding anyone guilty of breaching the McCann's right to the presumption of innocence.

Nor that of Bruckner's so all good then, carry on as you were...

[barrier]

And none so stupid as those who have no common sense or logic.

I'm in good company.

[Eleanor]

I'm in good company.

Indeed you are.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

The main individuals in the sceptic world denied the presumption of innocence are Kate and Gerry McCann.  Brueckner's rights will be defended I presume by very expensive lawyers and the law of the land.

I have seen nowhere that Brueckner has had to take recourse to the ECHR to defend his entitlement to that human right but I know the McCanns have had to.

Why sceptics cannot see the hypocrisy of their super sensibility in defence of Brueckner's rights and their attitude in trying to trample McCann rights into the dust remains a mystery.

They both have equal rights under the law, of course. I do t think there’s much chance of anyone bringing defamation upon CB.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

This is true.

Me?  I was a bit lonely in days of yore, living on my own at the time.  But I was involved from the start and quite devastated by this mindless desire to blame The McCanns when it was obvious that it simply wasn't possible.

For me it was Clarence ignoring Smithman at that London press conference when I’d read a report of the Smithman sighting in a UK newspaper. I even wrote to CEOPs staggered when Mitchell said he was getting “private briefings”. I’ve followed the case ever since. Despite the language on here and talk of “sceptics” I don’t loath the McCanns. Abduction or accident they have suffered a terrible tragedy as a result of leaving their very young children unsupervised.