"Start by Asking Yourself What is a Supporter and Work on from There”

[Erngath]

I don't suspect you of anything but I do expect to back up your claims with evidence.

You suspect me of lying?
You think I would make up the existence of these posts or exaggerate them?
They are there on that forum for all to see.
I am not bringing them over here, so let it rest.
If you don't believe me, then fine that's the end of the debate.

ETA

I actually do trust members of this forum not to lie, or make up stories or exaggerate, until I have reason not to.

[G-Unit]

Of course it's true or do you believe I have invented the thread where the photo of a little girl is labelled the Lollita photograph.
Or do you believe I have invented the thread labelling a named person a paedophile.
It is true.
I most assuredly assumed you would not agree with this filth but I did assume you would condemn them.

Does every member of that forum who posted on those threads express the same opinions?

[G-Unit]

What is a paedophile ?
There seems to be a wide range of behaviour that comes under that description, from kiddie-fiddling to collector of photographs. Public perception is very wide of the mark compared with legal definition.

Someone sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children, although, as you say, the label is applied to all sorts of other behaviours.

[slartibartfast]

Please provide a cite for this allegation.  This is my second request.

Rob, it is an accepted fact that Nigel Nessling aka vee8 was a convicted peadophile.

[Brietta]

I don't suspect you of anything but I do expect to back up your claims with evidence.

I am confirming that there is such a forum as referred to by Erngath'

I confirm there is a thread there entitled McCann : Lolita Maddie - Image Taken By Photographer Paul Grover


I haven't bothered to investigate whether or not a named person is described as a paedophile for the simple reason I did not have to as it appears to have already been confirmed and the existence of such condoned on this forum. 

[jassi]

I am confirming that there is such a forum as referred to by Erngath'

I confirm there is a thread there entitled McCann : Lolita Maddie - Image Taken By Photographer Paul Grover


I haven't bothered to investigate whether or not a named person is described as a paedophile for the simple reason I did not have to as it appears to have already been confirmed and the existence of such condoned on this forum.

Interesting   that you felt it necessary to dig Erngath out of her hole. 

[Alice Purjorick]

I am confirming that there is such a forum as referred to by Erngath'

I confirm there is a thread there entitled McCann : Lolita Maddie - Image Taken By Photographer Paul Grover


I haven't bothered to investigate whether or not a named person is described as a paedophile for the simple reason I did not have to as it appears to have already been confirmed and the existence of such condoned on this forum.

Condoned by whom? It's difficult to work out whether you mean factual or inferred so to save three pages or so of ping pong cover both pls.

[Brietta]

Interesting   that you felt it necessary to dig Erngath out of her hole. 

Actually Jassi ... in my opinion 'twas thee who was sailing very close to the wind as far as forum protocols are concerned ... so maybe you should develop an interest in watching out for that in future posts.

[Brietta]

Condoned by whom? It's difficult to work out whether you mean factual or inferred so to save three pages or so of ping pong cover both pls.

I have absolutely no intention of ping ponging anything.  If you have a serious post to make which is on topic fire ahead and I or whomsoever you are addressing may or may not deign to answer it ... please bear in mind that goading in any shape or form is unacceptable.

[Alice Purjorick]

I have absolutely no intention of ping ponging anything.  If you have a serious post to make which is on topic fire ahead and I or whomsoever you are addressing may or may not deign to answer it ... please bear in mind that goading in any shape or form is unacceptable.

OK then.
Condoned by whom?

[jassi]

Actually Jassi ... in my opinion 'twas thee who was sailing very close to the wind as far as forum protocols are concerned ... so maybe you should develop an interest in watching out for that in future posts.

In which case we would have had an appeal to the Star Chamber.

[Brietta]

In which case we would have had an appeal to the Star Chamber.

It was a close run thing that such an event might have been forthcoming.

[Sunny]

A current thread on Erngath's forum

Brietta on UK Injustice sums up everything perfectly ....

That shows exactly what they think of this forum.  Perhaps Erngath or other members of both forums would care to comment.

[jassi]

I wasn't aware she had a forum.
Is there a link?
I do hope its not one of those pink ones - they really do my eyes no favours

[Erngath]

A current thread on Erngath's forum

Brietta on UK Injustice sums up everything perfectly ....

That shows exactly what they think of this forum.  Perhaps Erngath or other members of both forums would care to comment.

 
First of all. It is not my forum.
Secondly I have not contributed to that thread.
Thirdly if you are trying to equate anything on that thread, which I have just read for the first time, in a desperate attempt to justify the appalling posts which I mentioned earlier, then major fail in my opinion.

Is anyone on that thread using a photograph of Madeleine and calling it a Lollita photograph?
Is anyone labelling a named person as a paedophile?
I think not!