New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Amaral won his case in Portugal... You cant have as a defence that you are gullible  and believe total bull

Amaral won his case.

Mark Saunokonoko's podcasts are rational, reasonable and honest.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Amaral won his case.

Mark Saunokonoko's podcasts are rational, reasonable and honest.

Flogging dead horses is such a laborious job! 

Regarding the German suspect- there is much to consider with regards he may have been involved in some capacity, this is not a libelous statement at all.  Trying to make fictional facts fit to make him look guilty of abduction is verging on libel I would say.

Kate did claim 'they had taken her'- both parents did believe she was dead at one point- then changed their minds, and forgave the  alleged abductor (paedophile gang- 'people aka allegedly kind childless couple).
You see this is the PR machine.(worth every penny) If they continued to say she was abducted feared dead at the hands of a paedophile gang their lives would have taken quite a different turn- VERY different.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes it is.

It is clear from the post she is forming a reasonable opinion based on statements from the lead investigator in the case.

There was no post to read, what are you talking about?

[Mr Gray]

Amaral won his case.

Mark Saunokonoko's podcasts are rational, reasonable and honest.

Amarals judgement applies to Portugal only..Saunokonokos podcasts are ful of things that are just not true..like amarals book

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Amarals judgement applies to Portugal only..Saunokonokos podcasts are ful of things that are just not true..like amarals book

That’s only your opinion.
Despite your view to the contrary a theory of rare stranger abduction has not been proven. People are entitled to honest, rational opinion. Not everyone shares your opinion.

[Mr Gray]

That’s only your opinion.
Despite your view to the contrary a theory of rare stranger abduction has not been proven. People are entitled to honest, rational opinion. Not everyone shares your opinion.

No there are factual lies in the podcasts..people are entitled to opinion but are limited by libel law. I'm quite aware others don't share my opinion...some people think the world is flat and that's the category those who follow amarals theory...belong in..imo

[G-Unit]

No there are factual lies in the podcasts..people are entitled to opinion but are limited by libel law. I'm quite aware others don't share my opinion...some people think the world is flat and that's the category those who follow amarals theory...belong in..imo

That's a bit over the top, isn't it? The flatness or not of the earth is a matter of fact, not opinion.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That's a bit over the top, isn't it? The flatness or not of the earth is a matter of fact, not opinion.

The sexual crimes s of Christian B are facts, but to some it’s only an opinion.
PS I think you meant to say the roundness of the earth is a matter of fact, surely the flatness is not a fact?

[Robittybob1]

The sexual crimes s of Christian B are facts, but to some it’s only an opinion.
PS I think you meant to say the roundness of the earth is a matter of fact, surely the flatness is not a fact?

That is a matter of opinion.

[Mr Gray]

That's a bit over the top, isn't it? The flatness or not of the earth is a matter of fact, not opinion.

I spoke to someone last week ..he seemed rational and of average intelligence. He believed the world was flat and that the sun travelled round the earth...its all in the bible it seems although he said he wasnt religious. he also gave som eevidence to support this. How can we be hurtling through space and never hit anything...the ratio of the soze of the sun is the same as the ratio of their distance to earth.

I asked about the McCann case and he was convinced the parents were involved.

For me those who follow the amaral theory of death in the aprtment and a cover up are just about as enlightened as the flat earthers

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

I spoke to someone last week ..he seemed rational and of average intelligence. He believed the world was flat and that the sun travelled round the earth...its all in the bible it seems although he said he wasnt religious. he also gave som eevidence to support this. How can we be hurtling through space and never hit anything...the ratio of the soze of the sun is the same as the ratio of their distance to earth.

I asked about the McCann case and he was convinced the parents were involved.

For me those who follow the amaral theory of death in the aprtment and a cover up are just about as enlightened as the flat earthers

The problem with that tale is that there is scientific evidence to support the theory that the earth isn’t flat. There is no scientific evidence to suggest that MM was abducted.

Also as much as I disagree with flat earthers I believe they should be free to express their beliefs.

[Mr Gray]

The problem with that tale is that there is scientific evidence to support the theory that the earth isn’t flat. There is no scientific evidence to suggest that MM was abducted.

Also as much as I disagree with flat earthers I believe they should be free to express their beliefs.

Both show a poor undersatnding an intepretation of the evidence...imo. Its good that poeple express their opinions...thats allows us to form judgements of them.

[G-Unit]

Both show a poor undersatnding an intepretation of the evidence...imo. Its good that poeple express their opinions...thats allows us to form judgements of them.

There's a group of people posting here whose opinions I disagree with. I don't judge people on the opinions they hold, however, it's how they arrived at those opinions which interests me.

Some of them are basing their opinions on gossipy media reports or they themselves are misreporting events. Others are interpreting the actual evidence in a different way than I am. In my opinion (lol) the first group are lazy and probably don't realise how unreliable the media are. I respect the second group.

[Mr Gray]

There's a group of people posting here whose opinions I disagree with. I don't judge people on the opinions they hold, however, it's how they arrived at those opinions which interests me.

Some of them are basing their opinions on gossipy media reports or they themselves are misreporting events. Others are interpreting the actual evidence in a different way than I am. In my opinion (lol) the first group are lazy and probably don't realise how unreliable the media are. I respect the second group.

I judge poeple on the opinions they hold...but only when I understand the evidence to support these opinions.

It tells me how good they are at assessing evidence. I don't think you understand how some of us have reached our conclusions,,,which makes your argument worthless. I think its an absolute fact that some errors in the statement s will be due to the way they were taken...thats supported by Colin sutton for one. You think the statements are 100% accurate.... think you are totally wrong which makes my opinion superior to yours..imo


that again is supported by the fact that the parents are not being seen as suspects in the investiagtion

[G-Unit]

I judge poeple on the opinions they hold...but only when I understand the evidence to support these opinions.

It tells me how good they are at assessing evidence. I don't think you understand how some of us have reached our conclusions,,,which makes your argument worthless. I think its an absolute fact that some errors in the statement s will be due to the way they were taken...thats supported by Colin sutton for one. You think the statements are 100% accurate.... think you are totally wrong which makes my opinion superior to yours..imo


that again is supported by the fact that the parents are not being seen as suspects in the investiagtion

The difference between you and I imo isn't that I believe the statements are 100% accurate, it's that you choose to believe what the McCanns said and disbelieve anything which contradicts their story and I don't.