New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[barrier]

I think it's the boat you missed

Lucky for him , its the one that's sinking.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So your opinion is factual because you think it is? Very convincing - not. In my opinion no-one has enough evidence to decide whether CB was involved in Madeleine's disappearance or not, so anyone arguing that he was is expressing opinion or placing their faith in the German investigators. I find it difficult to respect people who rely on others to tell them what happened.

I'm not relying on others to tell me what happened and I happen to think that that accusation is quite insulting.  You and I both have access to exactly the same information - I formed the opinion that Madeleine was taken by a predatory paedophile many years before anyone had ever heard of CB, so incidentally had Heri.  So - you respect his view, not mine because...?

[barrier]

I'm not relying on others to tell me what happened and I happen to think that that accusation is quite insulting.  You and I both have access to exactly the same information - I formed the opinion that Madeleine was taken by a predatory paedophile many years before anyone had ever heard of CB, so incidentally had Heri.  So - you respect his view, not mine because...?

Logical step from the three local amigos to a predatory paedo, so not earth shattering, but the next burning  question that needs an answer will be  once CB is ruled out what then , if they can having writ the legend.

[jassi]

Logical step from the three local amigos to a predatory paedo, so not earth shattering, but the next burning  question that needs an answer will be  once CB is ruled out what then , if they can having writ the legend.

Oh  if Brueckner is ruled out, the way forward is quite clear.

The Germans will say they know he did it but not enough evidence to convict,  move the goalposts & attempt to get him for something else.

OG will say they are happy with the Germans' conclusion, state they are not looking for anyone else and quitely pack up - honour satisfied  & all that.

McCann will continue the pretense that  Madeleine is alive and well and unharmed and just waiting to be found.


IMO

[G-Unit]

I'm not relying on others to tell me what happened and I happen to think that that accusation is quite insulting.  You and I both have access to exactly the same information - I formed the opinion that Madeleine was taken by a predatory paedophile many years before anyone had ever heard of CB, so incidentally had Heri.  So - you respect his view, not mine because...?

So what evidence has convinced you that CB is your 'predatory paedophile'? Whatever it is it doesn't seem to have convinced Heri at the moment.

[The General]

Oh  if Brueckner is ruled out, the way forward is quite clear.

The Germans will say they know he did it but not enough evidence to convict,  move the goalposts & attempt to get him for something else.

OG will say they are happy with the Germans' conclusion, state they are not looking for anyone else and quitely pack up - honour satisfied  & all that.

McCann will continue the pretense that  Madeleine is alive and well and unharmed and just waiting to be found.


IMO

The Convenient Patsy, starring Kiefer Sutherland as CB and Bandersnatch Cummerbund as HCW.

[Wonderfulspam]

The Convenient Patsy, starring Kiefer Sutherland as CB and Bandersnatch Cummerbund as HCW.

Supporting cast including Huge Ackman &  Jame Dudy Jench.

[Mr Gray]

So what evidence has convinced you that CB is your 'predatory paedophile'? Whatever it is it doesn't seem to have convinced Heri at the moment.

I think you are wrong again..Heri has said failure of the PJ to collect cigarette butts has meant loss of important evidence that could have nailed CB. Read his posts again

[Vertigo Swirl]

So what evidence has convinced you that CB is your 'predatory paedophile'? Whatever it is it doesn't seem to have convinced Heri at the moment.

You've started with a false argument as I have never once claimed to be convinced that CB is the predatory paedophile in question.  I think if not him, someone very much matching his previous history and characteristics will be shown to have committed the crime.  But for this view I must of course be ridiculed and disrespected.  I understand how it works, don't worry. 

[The General]

I think you are wrong again..Heri has said failure of the PJ to collect cigarette butts has meant loss of important evidence that could have nailed CB. Read his posts again

Now you say it like that.....
Why stop at one overlooking balcony / stairwell? Why not bag and tag all fag ends within a 200m radius?
Why not fingerprint every location?
Heri has that wrong, just like the Colour Purple Woman. But he still speaks from experience, whereas we don't.

[Brietta]

So what evidence has convinced you that CB is your 'predatory paedophile'? Whatever it is it doesn't seem to have convinced Heri at the moment.

There is not a single fair minded person on this board who does not respect Brueckner's right to the presumption of innocence in the outrage against Madeleine McCann although he is a proven rapist - torturer - paedophile in relation to other cases.

Your criticism should more appropriately be reserved for those who have delighted in pointing accusatory fingers at Madeleine's parents for the past fifteen years.

You prime amongst them.

I see an hypocrisy in that to which you are obviously blind.  Funny old world is it not 😁

[The General]

There is not a single fair minded person on this board who does not respect Brueckner's right to the presumption of innocence in the outrage against Madeleine McCann although he is a proven rapist - torturer - paedophile in relation to other cases.

Your criticism should more appropriately be reserved for those who have delighted in pointing accusatory fingers at Madeleine's parents for the past fifteen years.

You prime amongst them.

I see an hypocrisy in that to which you are obviously blind.  Funny old world is it not 😁

Alleged outrage. It hasn't even been proven an outrage occurred, far less who perpetrated it.
'An unknown incident leading to the disappearance of' would be a more accurate definition.

[Mr Gray]

Now you say it like that.....
Why stop at one overlooking balcony / stairwell? Why not bag and tag all fag ends within a 200m radius?
Why not fingerprint every location?
Heri has that wrong, just like the Colour Purple Woman. But he still speaks from experience, whereas we don't.

Heri would understand... As I do.. That it would be normal to collect butt's in the immediate vicinity.

Heri has his opinions.. I think hes absolutely wrong if he thinks that CB is going to walk simply on the butt's issue.
He was also wrong in his claim that a new statement after 14 years is unreliable... It might be... Then again it might not. So I've proved Heri wrong when it comes to assessing evidence.... So he has no claim to superiority

[barrier]

You've started with a false argument as I have never once claimed to be convinced that CB is the predatory paedophile in question.  I think if not him, someone very much matching his previous history and characteristics will be shown to have committed the crime.  But for this view I must of course be ridiculed and disrespected.  I understand how it works, don't worry.

What are the chances, another one, still like Rowley said, they walk amongst us, not in so many words but you should get the drift.

The reality is in any urban area, you cast your net wide and you find a whole range of offences and sex offenders who live nearby and those coincidences need to be sifted out; what is a coincidence and what could be linked to the investigation we are currently dealing with and just like we do in London we have been doing in Portugal so offences which could be linked have to be looked at and either ruled in or ruled out and that’s the work we have been doing.

[G-Unit]

You've started with a false argument as I have never once claimed to be convinced that CB is the predatory paedophile in question.  I think if not him, someone very much matching his previous history and characteristics will be shown to have committed the crime.  But for this view I must of course be ridiculed and disrespected.  I understand how it works, don't worry.

Oh, sorry, I thought you were arguing that he was. So you're not convinced that Wolters has identified the perpetrator, but you think it's likely to have been someone similar. Is there any evidence that a 'predatory paedophile' was involved?