New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[faithlilly]

And they would try again at a future trial, why on earth wouldn?t they?

Of course they would?and every piece of incriminating evidence. I don?t see your point.

[faithlilly]

Because it has absolutely no relevance to anything.  Would I have ignored my symptoms?  No.  Did I get good advice from Chat GPT as soon as they developed?  Yes.  Now what do you want to know?

Even ChatGPT say that they can sometimes be wrong.

[faithlilly]

I accept that he could be making it up but as I said before and will say again - it makes absolutely no sense for him to make up a story that flies in the face of his own daft theories and which potentially could get him in trouble with a lawyer, by lying about what he said.  That suggests to me that Fulscher probably did tell him something along those lines, that is a logical conclusion imo.  It also makes sense in the wider context - the Germans have said they have evidence which convinces them that Madeleine is dead and if we saw it we would be convinced too.  Now, feel free to ignore information which doesn?t suit you, at least to his credit Stellander acknowledged it and tried to make sense of it, even though it was not what he was hoping to hear from Fulscher.

It is you who is believing a story from an individual that for years you have stated is a charlatan. I always knew he was a charlatan so I believe nothing he says. I don?t need to waste time hypothesising as to his motive?.he is a liar no matter what his motivation. Have you now think that Stellander is credible?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Of course they would?and every piece of incriminating evidence. I don?t see your point.

Which is exactly what I said originally and you challenged it for reasons best known to yourself. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Even ChatGPT say that they can sometimes be wrong.

Absolutely, which is why I asked you to highlight anything you have found that I have sourced and posted from Chat GPT which you considered to be false or inaccurate..  So far you have identified nothing but deflected to ask instead about whether I would use Chat GPT as a tool for diagnosing sick children.  Very strange.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It is you who is believing a story from an individual that for years you have stated is a charlatan. I always knew he was a charlatan so I believe nothing he says. I don?t need to waste time hypothesising as to his motive?.he is a liar no matter what his motivation. Have you now think that Stellander is credible?

I?m only asking questions dear, I didn?t say I believed every word he said, merely pointing out how strange it is that he would make up something which contradicts his own theory and which could potentially cause him a problem with Fulscher, a man who is a lawyer.  You don?t need to waste your time doing anything at all you don?t want to but here you are arguing with someone you clearly dislike about something pretty trivial in the grand scheme of things.  Move on.