Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300424 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1635 on: October 18, 2020, 07:24:25 PM »

Why the appeal for information now then ?

So you don’t think Wolter has enough evidence to say Madeleine was murdered by Brueckner ? Why do you think he’s saying he has then ?

You are not listening to me.  I Don't Know.  I am just offering suggestions, since you asked.

My mind goes blank on this one, so if you believe in Psycho whatever then something could be telling me that he didn't do it.

I don't understand why I am unable to have any thoughts on this.  You know me by now.  I don't have a problem with opinions.  But the minute I try to think about this I get nothing.


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1636 on: October 18, 2020, 07:25:53 PM »
I thought the very nature of the Dark Web was that it ensured anonymity
how do they track people down and prosecute them for using it then?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1637 on: October 18, 2020, 07:33:13 PM »
Do police manage prosecutions for using the Dark Web ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1638 on: October 18, 2020, 07:33:35 PM »
how do they track people down and prosecute them for using it then?

It's jolly hard work, but they do it.  Jassi does have very odd ideas if she thinks it can't be done.

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1639 on: October 18, 2020, 07:34:10 PM »
I thought the very nature of the Dark Web was that it ensured anonymity
Not, as far as I know. IP addresses can be traced. Remember this one?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1640 on: October 18, 2020, 07:35:57 PM »
Do police manage prosecutions for using the Dark Web ?

The Police are actively pursuing this every day.  Hopefully you are pleased to hear this.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1641 on: October 18, 2020, 07:45:38 PM »
It's jolly hard work, but they do it.  Jassi does have very odd ideas if she thinks it can't be done.

I know very little about the Dark Web, which is why I was asking.
Others are obviously much more knowledgeable about its workings
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1642 on: October 18, 2020, 07:48:57 PM »
I know very little about the Dark Web, which is why I was asking.
Others are obviously much more knowledgeable about its workings
One doesn’t have to know anything about any website to realise ‘its workings’.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1643 on: October 18, 2020, 07:56:59 PM »
I know very little about the Dark Web, which is why I was asking.
Others are obviously much more knowledgeable about its workings

And nor do I.  And I certainly don't think that you do.  But you are the one who raised the subject.

I was once told by a Pensioned Off Police Officer that it is difficult.  He couldn't handle it.

Personally, I don't want to know.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1644 on: October 18, 2020, 07:58:43 PM »
You are not listening to me.  I Don't Know.  I am just offering suggestions, since you asked.

My mind goes blank on this one, so if you believe in Psycho whatever then something could be telling me that he didn't do it.

I don't understand why I am unable to have any thoughts on this.  You know me by now.  I don't have a problem with opinions.  But the minute I try to think about this I get nothing.

Thank you for your honesty.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1645 on: October 18, 2020, 08:02:02 PM »
Not, as far as I know. IP addresses can be traced. Remember this one?

What about those who use a proxy server ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1646 on: October 18, 2020, 08:05:20 PM »
Do police manage prosecutions for using the Dark Web ?
I don’t understand your question.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1647 on: October 18, 2020, 08:12:39 PM »
Thank you for your honesty.

Did you expect anything else?  I have seen some of your recent comments about me.  But you are on a hiding to nothing.  Been there and done all of this many moons ago.  It makes no impression on me these days.

I actually like you.  You can please yourself about me.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1648 on: October 18, 2020, 08:20:33 PM »
On 1 September 1998, 13 police forces raided alleged members of an international child pornography ring known as the Wonderland Club. The operation was code-named Operation Cathedral and resulted in the confiscation of 750,000 images and videos depicting 1,263 different children. Mendonça was among the few children (16 only) that could be identified.[3] However, his whereabouts remain unknown and police suspect that he was murdered by his abductors after being abused on camera for other members of the paedophile ring.[12][13]

This is from wiki re Rui Pedro...abducted in Portugal. I dont particularly like posting it...but there are just too many similarities..
So proof of abduction...no absolute proof of death but death most likely...just what HCW is  saying

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1649 on: October 18, 2020, 08:25:29 PM »
What about those who use a proxy server ?
I honestly don’t know.