A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Eleanor]

You didn't understand my point? If Amaral only influenced 'a few' people surely there's no need to keep moaning about him for twelve years? Perhaps you need to move on.

Not your business is it.

[Mr Gray]

When OG  identify and successfully prosecute the perp, we may be able to.

What if there's little or no evidence against the perp but they confess after a severe beating... That should be OK shouldn't it

[barrier]

When OG  identify and successfully prosecute the perp, we may be able to.

What if there's little or no evidence against the perp but they confess after a severe beating... That should be OK shouldn't it

Is that how OG work?

[Mr Gray]

Is that how OG work?

It's on record that this is how the pj have worked.... And sceptics have accepted it.
Grange won't be arresting or prosecuting anyone... It's a pj investigation

[G-Unit]

Not your business is it.

Why not?

[The General]

It's on record that this is how the pj have worked.... And sceptics have accepted it.
Grange won't be arresting or prosecuting anyone... It's a pj investigation

Yeh, but will Grange be dishing out pastings?
I love the naivety of the general public in regard to police brutality in the UK. It's quaint.

[barrier]

It's on record that this is how the pj have worked.... And sceptics have accepted it.
Grange won't be arresting or prosecuting anyone... It's a pj investigation

At least recognition of what a limited role OG have.

[Mr Gray]

Yeh, but will Grange be dishing out pastings?
I love the naivety of the general public in regard to police brutality in the UK. It's quaint.

Rubbish

[barrier]

Entente cordial soon ended with the non liking of post's.

[G-Unit]

As the mccanns are not suspects in either investigation isn't it about time you and others moved on

If some can reject the findings of the first investigation others can reject the pronouncements of the subsequent ones. Choice!

[G-Unit]

At least recognition of what a limited role OG have.

It's taken a long time, but as you say, the light has finally been seen.

[Mr Gray]

It's taken a long time, but as you say, the light has finally been seen.

More rubbish... As you haven't qualified your post with an opinion then I won't either

[Mr Gray]

If some can reject the findings of the first investigation others can reject the pronouncements of the subsequent ones. Choice!

The archiving report... The first investigation found no evidence of a crime by the mccanns. Neither has, the second.

I go by the evidence not the opinion of a convicted liar

[Brietta]

You didn't understand my point? If Amaral only influenced 'a few' people surely there's no need to keep moaning about him for twelve years? Perhaps you need to move on.

I understand your point only too well just as I understand the point of the puerile deflections which plague the board and would be better discussed on the thread about improvement if anyone was really interested.

Perhaps those who really should realise that everyone else has "moved on" are those stuck with the flies in the web of Amaral's lies daily regurgitating every false premise he ever dreamed up in the hopes of saving and furthering his career.
After clearing up the mess he and his theories left behind him the authorities are doing now what he was incapable of doing and that is properly conducting an investigation at the time into what happened to Madeleine McCann.

Please don't insult yourself by claiming "a big boy dunnit and ran way";  Amaral "dunnit" and has been the poster boy for it by dint of extolling that fact for over twelve years.

Amaral's influence on Madeleine's case was a total and utter disaster.  His baseless theories are the stuff of nonsense and none more so than his hypothesis involving a deep freezer complete with his anonymous eye witnesses who appear nowhere but in his imagination.

Snip

"The little girl died in that apartment" - Gonçalo Amaral on TVI


GA: If we take into account that, if we consider the traces that were found in the car boot…

JP: … which are in fact…

GA: … which are in fact from the little girl. In order to justify that bodily fluid as the lab says, it could only have been preserved and conserved in the cold because otherwise it would have been…

JP: That means that…

GA: … in an advanced state of decomposition, at least it’s a hypothesis. Therefore it’s a question of a deep freezer, or something similar, and there we had to search for it and that was what we were doing. This means, the contacts that they had, where they went, where they were seen… There are people who say that they were seen entering an apartment block near the cemetery in Praia da Luz. At that point in time we weren’t able to detect which apartment they entered, who lived there, because it’s also a bit complicated because you have to understand it’s a tourist area and often it’s not known who the apartment belongs to.

[Mr Gray]

I understand your point only too well just as I understand the point of the puerile deflections which plague the board and would be better discussed on the thread about improvement if anyone was really interested.

Perhaps those who really should realise that everyone else has "moved on" are those stuck with the flies in the web of Amaral's lies daily regurgitating every false premise he ever dreamed up in the hopes of saving and furthering his career.
After clearing up the mess he and his theories left behind him the authorities are doing now what he was incapable of doing and that is properly conducting an investigation at the time into what happened to Madeleine McCann.

Please don't insult yourself by claiming "a big boy dunnit and ran way";  Amaral "dunnit" and has been the poster boy for it by dint of extolling that fact for over twelve years.

Amaral's influence on Madeleine's case was a total and utter disaster.  His baseless theories are the stuff of nonsense and none more so than his hypothesis involving a deep freezer complete with his anonymous eye witnesses who appear nowhere but in his imagination.

Snip

"The little girl died in that apartment" - Gonçalo Amaral on TVI


GA: If we take into account that, if we consider the traces that were found in the car boot…

JP: … which are in fact…

GA: … which are in fact from the little girl. In order to justify that bodily fluid as the lab says, it could only have been preserved and conserved in the cold because otherwise it would have been…

JP: That means that…

GA: … in an advanced state of decomposition, at least it’s a hypothesis. Therefore it’s a question of a deep freezer, or something similar, and there we had to search for it and that was what we were doing. This means, the contacts that they had, where they went, where they were seen… There are people who say that they were seen entering an apartment block near the cemetery in Praia da Luz. At that point in time we weren’t able to detect which apartment they entered, who lived there, because it’s also a bit complicated because you have to understand it’s a tourist area and often it’s not known who the apartment belongs to.

Absolutely... I watched a video of Poulton last month singing amarals praises.... The alerts, from the digs, with a 100% record... That the, FFS, destroyed or lost the dna... Practically everything she said was untrue