Author Topic: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.  (Read 141229 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #135 on: October 01, 2016, 10:25:27 AM »
My biggest grumble about the inspection of vehicles has long been the simple fact of 10 cars inspected simultaneously.

There was an innocent scent in the Renault (spots of Gerry's blood on the ignition key) and there might, easily, have been innocent scents in any of the other 9 cars.

That could only risk confusion for the dog.

In what sense is that good practice?

What is good practice is what the PJ (in writing up their 'official' not! report of the inspection at the gym) say:  to test an area beforehand (for prior scents) then introduce whatever you want the dogs to test.

Grime's performance at PdL is littered with evidence of poor practice, and the documented records (closely studied) prove it.
I thought they were considered sufficiently spaced.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #136 on: October 01, 2016, 10:38:42 AM »
I thought they were considered sufficiently spaced.

If it was a random (simultaneous) selection of vehicles (it wasn't; there was only one vehicle in the line-up with "Find Madeleine" stickers on the back) then there might have been an equal chance (of any vehicle in the line-up) containing a scent within the dog's scent-range.

If there was more than one (vehicle in the line-up) with such a scent, then what was Eddie supposed to choose?

Offline Angelo222

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #137 on: October 01, 2016, 11:08:34 AM »
My biggest grumble about the inspection of vehicles has long been the simple fact of 10 cars inspected simultaneously.

There was an innocent scent in the Renault (spots of Gerry's blood on the ignition key) and there might, easily, have been innocent scents in any of the other 9 cars.

That could only risk confusion for the dog.

In what sense is that good practice?

What is good practice is what the PJ (in writing up their 'official' not! report of the inspection at the gym) say:  to test an area beforehand (for prior scents) then introduce whatever you want the dogs to test.


Grime had no control over the arrangements, if anyone was to blame it was Harrison for allowing shoddy practise in the first place.  If the arrangements provided by the Portuguese were inadequate he should have stopped the examinations.  Your obsession with Grime is misplaced ferryman, he was a lowly constable who had to do whatever he was tasked to do.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2016, 03:24:58 PM by John »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #138 on: October 01, 2016, 11:18:29 AM »
Quote
Now we were in an underground garage where 8 or so cars (actually 10) were parked, including our rented Renault Scenic.  It was hard to miss: the windows were plastered with pictures of Madeleine.  In medicine we would call this an 'unblinded' study, one that is susceptible to bias.  One of the dogs ran straight past our car, nose in the air, headed towards the next vehicle.  The handler stopped next to the Renault and called the dog.  It obeyed, returning to him, but then ran off again.  Staying by the car, Grime instructed the dog to come back several times and directed it several parts of the vehicle before it eventually supplied an alert by barking.

Kate McCann.

(My own addition) At one point in the video, Eddie actually squatted several seconds under the boot of the Renault, before getting up, wandering off and being called back again by Grime.

The evidence (of the influence of handler-bias) is well documented and actually referred to by Grime himself in his profile.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2016, 11:23:52 AM by ferryman »

Offline Angelo222

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #139 on: October 01, 2016, 11:24:32 AM »
Kate McCann.

(My own addition) At one point in the video, Eddie actually squatted several seconds under the boot of the Renault, before getting up, wandering off and being called back again by Grime.

I totally agree regardless of my own views in this case, the dog handler should never have been made aware which vehicle was of most interest. Several identical Scenics should have been tested together because the whole world knew the McCanns had a Scenic hire car.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2016, 11:26:42 AM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #140 on: October 01, 2016, 11:26:47 AM »
Grime had no control over the arrangements, if anyone was to blame it was Harrison for allowing shoddy practise in the first place.  If the arrangements provided by the Portuguese were inadequate he should have stopped the examinations.  Your obsession with Grime is misplaced ferryman, he was a lowly constable who had to do whatever he was tasked to do.

Harrison should definitely have been more intrusive.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #141 on: October 01, 2016, 11:28:25 AM »
Harrison should definitely have been more intrusive.

I think the British cops got carried away with it all and left their brains at Passport Control.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline G-Unit

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #142 on: October 01, 2016, 11:48:06 AM »
Both your enboldened sentences are assumptions too!

I made is clear that I didn't know (was assuming ) by starting with "To me, it seems ...."


Why pick on me when you are guilty of the same?

Sorry Sadie, I wasn't intending to 'pick on' you. I was trying to make the point that assumptions don't really add anything to the debate. To demonstrate that I offered another assumption, different to yours.

As neither can be proved right or wrong using the evidence available both assumptions are useless.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #143 on: October 01, 2016, 11:55:57 AM »
If it was a random (simultaneous) selection of vehicles (it wasn't; there was only one vehicle in the line-up with "Find Madeleine" stickers on the back) then there might have been an equal chance (of any vehicle in the line-up) containing a scent within the dog's scent-range.

If there was more than one (vehicle in the line-up) with such a scent, then what was Eddie supposed to choose?
I don't understand your question.
"If there was more than one (vehicle in the line-up) with such a scent, then what was Eddie supposed to choose?" It would seem to be "more than one" chosen.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2016, 11:59:00 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #144 on: October 01, 2016, 11:59:33 AM »
Sorry, replying to this (from G-Unit)


What you have picked up is something translated from the French by Anna Esse and without official index referencing.

Let's stick to the official files, shall we?

Do you agree that the 'official' record (of the inspection at the gym) is a pile of crock?

What I 'picked up' was a quote from the official files, I forgot to post the link;

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/EDDIE-KEELA.htm
08-Processo Volume 8 pages 2186 to 2188
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #145 on: October 01, 2016, 12:01:18 PM »
Sorry Sadie, I wasn't intending to 'pick on' you. I was trying to make the point that assumptions don't really add anything to the debate. To demonstrate that I offered another assumption, different to yours.

As neither can be proved right or wrong using the evidence available both assumptions are useless.

Assumptions?

Adducing facts and drawing the (only) logical inferences from them that can be drawn is not to make assumptions.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #146 on: October 01, 2016, 12:06:47 PM »
What I 'picked up' was a quote from the official files, I forgot to post the link;

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/EDDIE-KEELA.htm
08-Processo Volume 8 pages 2186 to 2188

Inspection of the apartments.
Eddie and Keela - what the Madeleine McCann case file says.

What you specifically quoted does not have an index reference.

It may be included in the official files but it is not from the official files.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #147 on: October 01, 2016, 12:27:39 PM »
I think the British cops got carried away with it all and left their brains at Passport Control.

I don;t suppose they ever imagined that their work would be subjected to detailed scrutiny by armchair detectives in their hundreds. The British police did their best to get stuff kept secret when it dawned on them that the Portuguese intended to release the files, but some was missed. I note one of Harrison's reports was marked 'Restricted' but it was released.

Expecting people to be perfect at all times is unrealistic in my opinion. How many people would be confident that their work is so good that no-one could ever criticise it? Not many, if they were honest. Only recently a murderer was caught in part because a police officer didn't follow correct procedure. He got his man but lost his job.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Angelo222

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #148 on: October 01, 2016, 12:46:25 PM »
I don;t suppose they ever imagined that their work would be subjected to detailed scrutiny by armchair detectives in their hundreds. The British police did their best to get stuff kept secret when it dawned on them that the Portuguese intended to release the files, but some was missed. I note one of Harrison's reports was marked 'Restricted' but it was released.

Expecting people to be perfect at all times is unrealistic in my opinion. How many people would be confident that their work is so good that no-one could ever criticise it? Not many, if they were honest. Only recently a murderer was caught in part because a police officer didn't follow correct procedure. He got his man but lost his job.

Good points G-Unit.  Something I don't understand though is, were the dogs sent to PdL to clear the arguidos or implicate them?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Mark Harrison and the searches he recommended and took part in.
« Reply #149 on: October 01, 2016, 01:05:51 PM »
I totally agree regardless of my own views in this case, the dog handler should never have been made aware which vehicle was of most interest. Several identical Scenics should have been tested together because the whole world knew the McCanns had a Scenic hire car.

Eddie's behaviour changed when passing that car. That is on video and clear evidence of him finding the scent. It didn't change passing another car but the Scenic regardless of posters or what others think. The dog behaviour changing is clear to all.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.