(With thanks to Joana / Astro for translation)
On the other hand, the actions that are part of the reconstitution act are compatible with the blood traces that were collected in the living room (it should be noted that the reconstitution takes place in the living room), as a result of the search and apprehension act that was carried out on the 22th of September 2004 (cfr. pages 173 and 233 and following), which mentions that traces were collected on the floor, near the entrance door, inside and outside, near the interior electrical switch on the right hand side of the entrance door, near the entrance on the left hand side of the sofa, on a pair of trainers belonging to MM [Leandro] Silva that were located between the sofas, on a mop (handle) and its bucket.
These traces, according to forensics exams, are of human blood and of human and animal blood (cfr. page 235), and although insufficient to establish whom they belong to through the DNA (pages 1780 and following), they reveal that something terrible happened in that living room, something that originated the existence of human blood on the floor and on the walls, which was cleaned with a mop and a bucket; the blood that was on the mop was located on the handle, revealing that the person who used the mop had in turn his or her hands dirty with blood. Therefore, the traces that were collected in the living room reinforce the reliability of the reconstitution.
Someone has to explain to me, in words of one syllable or less, how the smoking gun forensic evidence of the alleged massacre amounted to anything more than a nicked finger chopping up a piece of meat, someone mopping it up and throwing the bucket of water out of the door, possibly nine days after the disappearance in a home in which everyone continued to live (i.e., an average household day prior to the day on which the PJ boys turned up with their torch - depending on mealtimes and when the PJ actually turned up).
Alternatively, explain to me how the results prove the macabre alleged events.
This "forensic" appreciation of the state of the living-room took place on 22 September. João's "reconstruction" (unless a different reliable source shows otherwise) took place on 7 October, i.e. weeks before the "voluntary" filmed "reconstruction".
But somehow, this timeline gets turned on its head:
Therefore, the traces that were collected in the living room reinforce the reliability of the reconstitution.
Hmmm?